https://wiki.isikhnas.com/index.php?action=history&feed=atom&title=Translations%3AAdvanced_Field_Epi%3AManual_2_-_Diagnostic_Tests%2F95%2FenTranslations:Advanced Field Epi:Manual 2 - Diagnostic Tests/95/en - Revision history2026-08-19T18:46:14ZRevision history for this page on the wikiMediaWiki 1.31.16https://wiki.isikhnas.com/index.php?title=Translations:Advanced_Field_Epi:Manual_2_-_Diagnostic_Tests/95/en&diff=36981&oldid=prevFuzzyBot: Importing a new version from external source2015-05-10T07:42:32Z<p>Importing a new version from external source</p>
<table class="diff diff-contentalign-left" data-mw="interface">
<col class="diff-marker" />
<col class="diff-content" />
<col class="diff-marker" />
<col class="diff-content" />
<tr class="diff-title" lang="id">
<td colspan="2" style="background-color: #fff; color: #222; text-align: center;">← Revisi sebelumnya</td>
<td colspan="2" style="background-color: #fff; color: #222; text-align: center;">Revisi per 10 Mei 2015 07.42</td>
</tr><tr><td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno" id="mw-diff-left-l1" >Baris 1:</td>
<td colspan="2" class="diff-lineno">Baris 1:</td></tr>
<tr><td class='diff-marker'>−</td><td style="color: #222; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #ffe49c; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>For example: ELISA and AGID are two serological tests for <del class="diffchange diffchange-inline">Johne’s </del>disease in sheep. Both tests measure antibody levels in serum. Therefore, in an infected animal, the ELISA is more likely to be positive in AGID-positive animals than in AGID-negative animals, so that the sensitivities of the two tests are correlated (not independent). This is illustrated in Table <del class="diffchange diffchange-inline">xx</del>.5, where the sensitivities of both tests vary markedly, depending on the result of the other test. In contrast, serological tests such as ELISA and AGID are likely to be less correlated with agent-detection tests, such as faecal culture.</div></td><td class='diff-marker'>+</td><td style="color: #222; font-size: 88%; border-style: solid; border-width: 1px 1px 1px 4px; border-radius: 0.33em; border-color: #a3d3ff; vertical-align: top; white-space: pre-wrap;"><div>For example: ELISA and AGID are two serological tests for <ins class="diffchange diffchange-inline">Johne's </ins>disease in sheep. Both tests measure antibody levels in serum. Therefore, in an infected animal, the ELISA is more likely to be positive in AGID-positive animals than in AGID-negative animals, so that the sensitivities of the two tests are correlated (not independent). This is illustrated in Table <ins class="diffchange diffchange-inline">4</ins>.5, where the sensitivities of both tests vary markedly, depending on the result of the other test. In contrast, serological tests such as ELISA and AGID are likely to be less correlated with agent-detection tests, such as faecal culture.</div></td></tr>
</table>FuzzyBothttps://wiki.isikhnas.com/index.php?title=Translations:Advanced_Field_Epi:Manual_2_-_Diagnostic_Tests/95/en&diff=6871&oldid=prevFuzzyBot: Importing a new version from external source2014-08-25T03:00:33Z<p>Importing a new version from external source</p>
<p><b>Halaman baru</b></p><div>For example: ELISA and AGID are two serological tests for Johne’s disease in sheep. Both tests measure antibody levels in serum. Therefore, in an infected animal, the ELISA is more likely to be positive in AGID-positive animals than in AGID-negative animals, so that the sensitivities of the two tests are correlated (not independent). This is illustrated in Table xx.5, where the sensitivities of both tests vary markedly, depending on the result of the other test. In contrast, serological tests such as ELISA and AGID are likely to be less correlated with agent-detection tests, such as faecal culture.</div>FuzzyBot