Translations:Advanced Field Epi:Manual 2 - Diagnostic Tests/218/en: Perbedaan revisi

(Importing a new version from external source)
 
(Importing a new version from external source)
 
Baris 1: Baris 1:
Although these methods don’t rely on a gold standard for comparison, they do depend on a number of important assumptions. Violation of these assumptions could render the resulting estimates invalid. Non-gold-standard methods for estimating sensitivity and specificity of diagnostic tests have been described in more detail by Hui and Walter ([#_ENREF_9 1980]), Staquet et al. ([#_ENREF_19 1981]) and Enøe et al. ([#_ENREF_4 2000]).
+
Although these methods don't rely on a gold standard for comparison, they do depend on a number of important assumptions. Violation of these assumptions could render the resulting estimates invalid. Non-gold-standard methods for estimating sensitivity and specificity of diagnostic tests have been described in more detail by Hui and Walter ([#9 1980]), Staquet et al. ([#19 1981]) and Enøe et al. ([#4 2000]).

Revisi terkini pada 10 Mei 2015 14.50

Informasi pesan (berkontribusi)

Pesan ini tidak memiliki dokumentasi. Jika Anda tahu di mana dan bagaimana pesan ini digunakan, Anda dapat membantu penerjemah lain dengan menambahkan dokumentasi untuk pesan ini.

Definisi pesan (Advanced Field Epi:Manual 2 - Diagnostic Tests)
Although these methods don't rely on a gold standard for comparison, they do depend on a number of important assumptions. Violation of these assumptions could render the resulting estimates invalid. Non-gold-standard methods for estimating sensitivity and specificity of diagnostic tests have been described in more detail by Hui and Walter ([#9 1980]), Staquet et al. ([#19 1981]) and Enøe et al. ([#4 2000]).
TerjemahanAlthough these methods don't rely on a gold standard for comparison, they do depend on a number of important assumptions. Violation of these assumptions could render the resulting estimates invalid. Non-gold-standard methods for estimating sensitivity and specificity of diagnostic tests have been described in more detail by Hui and Walter ([#9 1980]), Staquet et al. ([#19 1981]) and Enøe et al. ([#4 2000]).

Although these methods don't rely on a gold standard for comparison, they do depend on a number of important assumptions. Violation of these assumptions could render the resulting estimates invalid. Non-gold-standard methods for estimating sensitivity and specificity of diagnostic tests have been described in more detail by Hui and Walter ([#9 1980]), Staquet et al. ([#19 1981]) and Enøe et al. ([#4 2000]).